For the first time, there is a legally grounded, independently verifiable definition of what a genuine permanent carbon removal looks like. For businesses integrating carbon offsetting into their decarbonisation strategy, that clarity matters more than it might first appear.
On 3 February 2026, the European Commission adopted the first set of methodologies under the Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming Regulation (EU) 2024/3012, known as the CRCF. In doing so, it created the world’s first voluntary certification standard for permanent carbon removals.
This is not a sweeping overhaul of how carbon markets work. It is something more considered and, in the long run, more useful: a clear, enforceable framework that defines what genuinely permanent carbon removal looks like, how it should be measured, and how it can be independently verified. It brings rigour to an area of the voluntary carbon market that has long needed it.
For businesses building carbon reduction plans, integrating offsetting into their sustainability strategy, or simply trying to make credible climate commitments, this development is worth understanding properly.
The Commission has now defined certification methodologies for three permanent carbon removal activities:
For each of these technologies, the regulation sets out precisely what qualifies as a verified tonne of removal, how permanence must be guaranteed, how risks such as leakage and liability are managed, and what independent verification requires. The delegated regulation will pass through a two-month scrutiny period in the European Parliament and Council before its expected entry into force in April 2026.
Further methodologies are already in development, covering carbon farming practices including agroforestry, peatland rewetting and afforestation, as well as carbon storage in bio-based construction materials. An EU Buyers’ Club is also being established to support corporate demand for high-integrity removals. This is a structured, progressive programme of standardisation, not a one-time policy announcement.
Trust has been the central challenge facing the voluntary carbon market for some years. Investigative reporting, high-profile greenwashing cases and growing academic scrutiny have made many sustainability professionals cautious about offsetting, even where the underlying intent is sound.
The numbers are striking. Around 80% of UK environmental professionals report serious concerns about the credibility of existing offsetting schemes (source). More than half of corporate leaders say they worry about greenwashing accusations (source). Yet 69% of chief executives regard sustainability as a genuine growth opportunity (source), and 49% of business-to-business buyers are already directing more spend towards suppliers with credible sustainability credentials (source).
The gap between ambition and action is not usually a lack of willingness. It is a lack of confidence that the frameworks available are robust enough to stand behind. Businesses do not want to make claims they cannot substantiate. They want mechanisms they can trust.
At One Tribe, this is something we hear regularly from the businesses we work with. The appetite for meaningful climate action is genuine. What has often been missing is a clear standard that defines what good looks like. The CRCF begins to provide exactly that.
For organisations operating in Europe, the CRCF creates a new reference point for credible carbon removal. Projects certified under its framework will carry legal weight. Claims built on certified removals will be defensible in ways that much of the voluntary market has historically not been.
For businesses in the UK, the picture is somewhat different but no less relevant. Although the UK has its own developing carbon market framework, European standards have a well-established influence on UK regulatory thinking, investor expectations and procurement requirements. The CRCF is setting a global quality benchmark, and UK businesses would be wise to understand it on those terms.
According to the OECD Global Corporate Sustainability Report 2025, of the 12,900 companies that disclosed sustainability information in 2024, only 42% had that information externally assured, and only 17% opted for the more rigorous reasonable assurance standard. That reflects a wider pattern: many businesses are publishing sustainability commitments that have not yet been subjected to the kind of independent scrutiny that investors and regulators increasingly expect. As standards like the CRCF raise the bar, that gap will become harder to ignore.
Organisations that build their decarbonisation strategies on verified, high-integrity frameworks now will be better placed as regulatory and commercial expectations continue to tighten. The direction is clear, and moving early is considerably easier than catching up later.
There is a broader shift taking place across corporate sustainability, and this regulation is part of it. Climate action is moving from voluntary declarations to verifiable systems. The questions being asked by investors, supply chain partners and procurement teams are becoming more specific, and the expectation is increasingly that answers will come with evidence attached.
In this context, climate commitments that cannot be substantiated are not simply unconvincing. They carry genuine reputational and regulatory risk. A claim without a credible methodology behind it is increasingly difficult to defend, and the standards now being set by the EU make that contrast sharper.
One Tribe has always held that climate action needs to be visible, verified and genuinely valuable to the businesses that undertake it. The emergence of frameworks like the CRCF reinforces that view. As the standard rises, the opportunity for businesses is not just to meet expectations but to build real trust with the people and organisations that matter most to them.
The methodologies set out in the CRCF reflect a set of principles that are useful to consider beyond the regulation itself. They offer a practical lens for evaluating the quality of any carbon removal or offsetting activity:
These are the questions that discerning investors, informed customers and regulators are already asking. A well-constructed decarbonisation strategy, supported by high-integrity offsetting, should be able to answer all of them.
At One Tribe, these principles underpin how we support businesses in making their climate action meaningful. We work alongside organisations to ensure that the steps they take are not only credible today but remain so as standards continue to evolve.
The voluntary carbon market is entering a more structured phase. What has been fragmented and inconsistent is becoming framework-led and independently governed. The CRCF is an important milestone in that process, and it signals clearly where corporate climate action is heading: towards standardised, auditable, institutionally backed commitments.
For business leaders, sustainability professionals and organisations building carbon reduction plans, this is a constructive development. It provides the clarity that has been lacking. It raises the standard for what credible offsetting looks like. And it gives businesses a stronger foundation on which to build climate strategies that stand up to scrutiny.
Climate action should strengthen your organisation, build trust with your stakeholders and create lasting value. It should be something you are confident standing behind. One Tribe is here to help you get there.
climate action incentives, one tribe climate action, certified climate action, certifying climate action, certification for environmental action, how to improve my business carbon footprint, how to take climate action, incentives to increase sales,
One Tribe is a Climate Action Platform enabling businesses and their customers to make a positive environmental impact.
Eric currently works as an independent consultant at the intersection of nature and climate, focused on catalysing market and non-market solutions to drive the just transition.
He previously was Head of Product at Earthshot Labs, supporting nature conservation and restoration projects across the global south secure project finance. Prior to Earthshot Labs, Eric led nature-based carbon project development for Gorongosa National Park in Mozambique and founded the Carbon Cooperative, a global alliance of leading nature conservation and restoration practitioners exploring carbon finance. After serving in the Peace Corps in Mozambique out of university, he spent much of his 20s working in community-based conservation and ecosystem restoration efforts in Sub-Saharan Africa interspersed with two startup ventures as co-founder and CEO of a mental health tech startup and COO of a sustainable coffee company. Eric has a dual Masters in Environmental Engineering and Environmental Policy from Stanford University where he was a NSF Graduate Research Fellow and a BS in Environmental Engineering from Tufts University.
Alan is a risk management thought-leader, superconnector, and FinTech pioneer. His mission is to enable an Earth Positive economy which includes nature in global accounting systems.
Alan is Founder of Generation Blue, a venture studio dedicated to planetary game changers powered by exponential technologies. Previously, Alan established Natural Capital Markets at Lykke AG, pioneering blockchain based forestry and carbon backed tokens. Alan has over two decades of risk management experience advising global financial institutions, and was a founding member of the RiskMetrics Group, a JPMorgan spin-off. Alan is an investor and advisor to regenerative impact ventures, including TreeBuddy.Earth, Regenativ, and Vlinder Climate.
Lori Whitecalf made history when she became the first woman to be elected Chief of Sweetgrass First Nation in 2011. She served three terms of office from 2011-2017.
Lori took a two-year hiatus from leadership to expand the family ranch and serve as the FSIN Senior Industry Liaison. She was re-elected on November 29. 2019 and again on November 30, 2021, as Chief of Sweetgrass. Chief Whitecalf practises a traditional lifestyle of hunting, fishing and gathering. She currently sits on the following boards: Saskatchewan Indian Institute of Technology, FSIN Lands and Resource Commission, Battle River Treaty 6 Health Centre and Battleford Agency Tribal Chiefs Executive Council, FSIN Women’s Commission.
Tina is the Chief Business Officer for MLTC Industrial Investments, the Economic Development arm of the Meadow Lake Tribal Council. She has a diverse background of experience. Having spent 15 years as a municipal Chief Operating Officer, 20 years involved in Saskatchewan’s Health Authority Board Keewatin Yatthe and 9 years with Northern Lights Board of Education.
She continues as a Board Member with Beaver River Community Futures supporting small business development in her home region. Tina brings a wealth of experience in a variety of fields and many connections to the Indigenous communities of Northern Saskatchewan. In addition Tina holds a BA Advanced from the U of S, a Certificate in Local Government Authority from the U of R and is certified as a Professional Economic Developer for Saskatchewan and a certified Technician Aboriginal Economic Developer (TAED).
Tootoosis’ career spans 40+ years in HRM, political leadership, and Indigenous economic development, as a dedicated bridge builder and advocate for Indigenous causes.
As a key member of the Saskatoon Regional Economic Development Authority (SREDA) team since 2021, he develops strategies for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission final report and Call to Action #92.
He is a graduate of the First Nations University of Canada and a certified Professional Aboriginal Economic Developer. Spearheading various community initiatives while serving as a Chair of the SIEDN while directing ILDII and WIBF. Founder of MGT Consulting Tootoosis is based in Saskatoon, Treaty Six Territory.
Cy Standing (Wakanya Najin in Dakota) has a long and distinguished career including serving overseas as an Electronics Technician in the Royal Canadian Air Force, former Chief of Wahpeton Dakota Nation, former Vice Chief of the Federation of Saskatchewan Indigenous Nations (FSIN), past Executive Director of Community Development Branch of the Department of Northern Saskatchewan as well as an Order in Council appointment to the Federal Parole Board.
Mr. Standing has served as a Director on many Profit and Non-Profit Corporate Boards, including serving as a Director for Affinity Credit Union with assets of over six billion dollars as well as IMI Brokerage and Wanuskewin and is currently a member of the One Tribe Indigenous Carbon Board.